I am a Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Pennsylvania. My research interests are in Economic History and Political Economy, especially in spatial and network settings.
Rather than govern from a fixed capital, medieval European kings were itinerant. Itinerant kingship was a rational coalition-building strategy employed by relatively weak rulers in the face of potentially violent elites. To empirically explore itinerant kingship, I introduce data on the daily location of the English king from 1199 to 1547. Utilizing genealogical data for feudal barons and the timing of contested elections for bishops, I show that the king's itinerary targeted "key players" within the elite network to maintain political support. When the Early Modern "military revolution" increased the military power of the king vis-à-vis the elites, European kings adopted stationary governments.
A Theory of Special Legislation and Its Decline
(with Slade Mendenhall) Draft coming soon.
For roughly 800 years, "legislation" often referred to special legislation—narrow bills tailored to the needs of specific individuals, firms, or properties. General laws were viewed with skepticism. Today, the opposite is true: broad laws are considered essential, and most states have banned special bills. This article reinterprets this historical shift, arguing that special legislation and the modern administrative state are substitutes. It contends that the transition from special to general legislation, often framed in terms of anti-corruption, was actually driven by politicians’ desires to create and extract rents facilitated by the 19th-century transportation boom. Thus, the rise of the administrative state and the expansion of American state capacity are seen as endogenous outcomes of industrialization.
Islam, Trade, and the Rise of Northwestern Europe
(with Marcus Shera)
The expansion of the Islamic Caliphate in the seventh century cut many European cities off from their trade partners in the Middle East and North Africa and ultimately redirected Mediterranean trade away from Western Europe. Taking a “market access” approach and by employing difference-in-differences empirical strategy, we show that the Islamic trade shock altered the spatial equilibrium of European urbanization in favor of northern Europe. We provide quantitative evidence for the validity, on some margins, of the often-debated “Pirenne Thesis.”
